Using the reply-all button
If you're included in an email thread with many other recipients, you don't need to reply to everyone. You can only respond to the sender unless the group needs to know your response. It is reasonable to have a sidebar conversation with only those who need to be included.
13
147 reads
CURATED FROM
IDEAS CURATED BY
Spending a large amount of time with someone literally causes you to pick up their habits. Choose your friends wisely.
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about communication with this collection
How to find common interests
How to be a good listener
How to overcome social anxiety
Related collections
Similar ideas to Using the reply-all button
Avoid "Reply to All" Like It's the Plague
Unless 100% of the recipients will find your information useful, only reply directly to the sender.
"Reply all" is too often the cause of office drama. Always be sure to check if you've accidentally clicked "reply all" before sending a sensitive message.
Using E-mail Bouncebacks
Using email bouncebacks is the most socially acceptable “no” there is. It doesn't mean you're telling them that you don't want to respond to them. It only states that you can't reply for a certain period of time.
Using awkward silence in written communication
When communicating on Slack or WhatApp, we don't have to respond instantly. Our quick responses are seldom the best. Our response may even change if we are in a different mood.
If you're dealing with someone who's used to quick responses, instead of responding instantly, let them k...
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates