[RBM] "P"​ - Performers'​ status quo: what should be done?

Mapping what each team is measured on—both official metrics and unspoken expectations—is crucial for alignment. Understanding deeper concerns, including personal risks like mortgages and family responsibilities, helps create solutions that address everyone's needs.

Effective change doesn't require perfect alignment—just enough overlap to create mutual benefit. The best change agents excel at finding these intersection points, demonstrating how their approach helps everyone advance their objectives simultaneously.

Building effective coalitions requires a "dream team" from various departments who'll benefit from your changes. Include influential early adopters, contributors who helped shape the solution, and communication networks to prevent great ideas from dying due to information gaps.

Technical professionals often get uncomfortable with relationship-building, but it's essential. The most effective alliances include both frontline workers and leaders, representatives from all affected departments, and a balance of visionaries and pragmatists.

One-on-one conversations before group meetings create space to understand individual concerns and address objections privately. This approach helps identify potential advocates and build a comprehensive stakeholder map for future reference.

Organizations most welcoming to innovation typically share characteristics: recent failure experiences, leadership that creates psychological safety, successful previous implementations, key influencers expressing dissatisfaction with current approaches, and external pressure creating urgency.

Timing dramatically impacts change initiatives. I've seen identical proposals fail and then succeed months later because organizational readiness had shifted. Pay attention to leadership changes, competitor moves, performance shortfalls, and new strategic initiatives.

Implementation approaches often become battlegrounds even after securing goal alignment. Create decision matrices that evaluate each approach against shared criteria to move conversations from emotional debates to objective analysis.

Looking for hybrid solutions that incorporate elements from multiple teams can resolve seemingly incompatible ideas.

Shifting discussions from "which approach is better" to "what specific trade-offs are we making" changes everything. This subtle reframing focuses on features and configurations rather than competing team solutions.

Different teams operate with different risk tolerances and incentive structures. Security teams face penalties for breaches but rarely receive recognition for enabling innovation, while development teams are measured on delivery speed but not long-term maintenance costs.

When your changes directly threaten someone's established goals, acknowledge the reality of the conflict rather than pretending it doesn't exist. Investigate how to redefine success for status quo defenders—can they become heroes of the transition rather than victims?

Consider phased approaches that allow for gradual adaptation rather than abrupt displacement. Identify potential new opportunities for those most affected, such as new roles in maintaining automated solutions they previously performed manually.

Not all conflicts can be resolved through better communication. Sometimes organizational change creates winners and losers. In these situations, transparency and empathy become even more crucial for acceptance.

Escalation to higher authorities rarely works long-term. Those who feel bypassed rather than included will find countless ways to undermine changes they don't support, and future initiatives will be dismissed faster as groups learn from others' mistakes.

When working with resistant teams, look for hidden undercurrents. A financial services company's compliance team that seemed resistant was actually under regulatory pressure to modernize—positioning our initiative as helping them meet modernization goals removed all barriers.

Organizational change happens through people, not PowerPoints. The time invested in building genuine relationships with potential allies pays dividends throughout your entire change journey.

Empathy in organizational change isn't just nice to have—it's a strategic imperative. The most successful transformations balance bold vision with pragmatic coalition-building and genuine concern for all stakeholders.

For more inspiration, visit my blog at Caterpillar Garden | Substack

This post in free version can be found here: https://blog.caterpillar.garden/p/rbm-p-performers-status-quo-what?r=eo5tk

Paid extended version also available here: https://blog.caterpillar.garden/p/rbme-p-performers-status-quo-what?r=eo5tk